![](https://globalnationalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/shehbaz-sharif-muhammad-yunus-2025-12-56341c63a1122ba65338e6d07bf9d5ad.jpg")
Bangladesh is facing a deepening democratic crisis as violence, persecution and mob rule increasingly become part of everyday life, raising serious concerns about the credibility of the country’s political transition ahead of national elections scheduled for early 2026. Observers note that the current political environment represents a sharp deterioration in law and order, marked by rising communal tensions, ethnic and religious attacks, suppression of dissent and the growing influence of extremist elements. What was initially presented as a corrective transition toward democratic renewal has instead exposed profound institutional and societal weaknesses.
The crisis traces back to mid-2024, when mass protests and unrest led to the removal of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the installation of an interim administration led by Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus. Since then, the political landscape has become increasingly polarised, with bans and restrictions placed on major political parties and their affiliated organisations, significantly narrowing democratic space. Although the interim government has described the forthcoming election as an opportunity to restore democratic legitimacy, critics argue that the necessary conditions for a free and fair vote remain absent. Continued violence, political exclusion and the absence of broad-based participation have cast doubt on whether the electoral process can command public trust.
Human rights groups and civil society organisations report a surge in mob violence, attacks on minority communities, intimidation of journalists and harassment of political opponents. These developments have contributed to an atmosphere of fear and insecurity, undermining citizens’ ability to freely express political views or participate in civic life. Analysts point out that Bangladesh’s democratic institutions have long been fragile, shaped by a history of military rule and authoritarian governance. The current crisis, they warn, risks entrenching a culture of impunity if accountability mechanisms are not restored and the rule of law reinforced.
The unrest has also drawn attention beyond Bangladesh’s borders, with regional observers expressing concern about the implications for stability in South Asia. Calls have grown for stronger protections for minorities, independent media and political activists, as well as for inclusive dialogue among all stakeholders. Critics argue that the interim administration has struggled to curb extremist violence or reassure vulnerable communities, while the absence of transparent decision-making has further weakened confidence in governance. Without urgent reforms, they warn, the normalisation of violence could become a permanent feature of Bangladesh’s political landscape.
As the country moves closer to elections, pressure is mounting on authorities to ensure an inclusive, secure and credible democratic process. For many Bangladeshis, the coming months will determine whether the nation can reverse its current trajectory and restore public faith in democratic institutions.
What was intended to be a forum for peace and dialogue in Pakistan’s restive northwest has instead highlighted the country’s deepening human rights crisis, after two university students reportedly disappeared following their participation in a peace jirga in Peshawar. The “grand peace jirga,” held on November 12 in Peshawar, was organised by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa chapter of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and attended by tribal elders, religious scholars, civil society representatives, activists and students. The gathering aimed to discuss the worsening security situation in the region, particularly in the context of rising violence and strained relations with Afghanistan.
However, shortly after the event concluded, Khubaib Wazir and Adnan Wazir, members of the Waziristan Students’ Society, reportedly went missing under circumstances that rights groups describe as deeply troubling. According to eyewitness accounts, the two students were intercepted by unidentified men in plain clothes while returning from the jirga to their hostels. Since then, their whereabouts remain unknown. No arrest records, charges or official statements have been issued by police or security agencies, leaving their families and fellow students in a state of anguish and uncertainty.
Human rights advocates say the incident reflects a broader pattern in Pakistan where individuals who engage in peaceful political or civic activity — particularly from tribal regions — are treated as security risks rather than citizens exercising their rights. In the aftermath of the disappearance, some pro-state voices have attempted to associate the students with the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM), a non-violent rights movement that has frequently criticised the conduct of security forces in former tribal areas. PTM leaders have repeatedly denied any links to militancy, maintaining that their demands centre on constitutional rights, accountability and an end to extrajudicial practices.
The case has reignited debate around enforced disappearances, a long-standing and contentious issue in Pakistan. Rights organisations estimate that thousands of people — including students, activists, journalists and political workers — have disappeared over the past decade, particularly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. Families often report being denied information, legal recourse or even acknowledgement from authorities. Despite the existence of official inquiry commissions, critics argue that accountability remains elusive, with very few cases resulting in prosecutions or clear explanations. The continued silence surrounding recent disappearances has further eroded public confidence in state institutions and the rule of law.
Civil society groups warn that such incidents send a chilling message to young Pakistanis: that even peaceful participation in dialogue or advocacy can invite severe consequences. As calls grow for the safe recovery of the missing students, rights defenders stress that genuine stability cannot be achieved through fear, secrecy and repression. For now, the disappearance of Khubaib Wazir and Adnan Wazir stands as a stark symbol of a shrinking civic space in Pakistan — where seeking peace and accountability increasingly comes at a personal cost.
Former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has issued a stark critique of the country’s current political trajectory in a wide‑ranging interview, saying violence, rising extremism and the sidelining of democratic norms under the interim government pose grave risks to Bangladesh’s future. Hasina’s comments come as the nation prepares for parliamentary elections scheduled for February 2026, a moment analysts say will be pivotal for the country’s stability and democratic legitimacy. Now living in exile, Hasina described the protests in 2024 that led to her ouster not as entirely peaceful demonstrations but as movements exploited by extremists who allegedly transformed civic unrest into violent uprisings. She said that attacks on police stations and destruction of infrastructure signified a breakdown in law and order, lamenting that what began as a protest deteriorated into chaos that she felt forced to leave the country to prevent further bloodshed.
Hasina sharply criticised the interim administration led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, arguing it lacks democratic legitimacy because it governs without a popular mandate. She alleged that the interim government has weakened constitutional structures, undermined the judiciary and failed to curb the influence of extremist factions, including the release of convicted militants she says are now emboldened in public life. According to her, this pattern undermines religious harmony and threatens the secular foundations of the state. She emphasized that free, fair and inclusive elections, including the legal participation of her party — the Awami League — are essential for restoring democratic governance. Hasina argued that elections held without major political parties cannot be considered legitimate and called for the release of political prisoners and lifting of bans on key political organisations.
Reflecting on her long tenure in office, Hasina highlighted what she described as her government’s achievements — including rapid economic growth, poverty reduction and strengthened infrastructure — while defending her record on minority rights and secular governance. She said that healthy political opposition had been encouraged under her leadership and that participatory democracy was central to her vision for Bangladesh. Turning to future prospects, Hasina said she would prioritise the restoration of constitutional rule, accountability for violence, protections for civil liberties and economic renewal if given another opportunity to lead. She reiterated her confidence in the resilience of the Bangladeshi people and their aspiration for participatory democracy.
Bangladesh’s political scene remains deeply fractured. Opposing parties, emerging movements and Islamist factions are all vying for influence ahead of elections that could reshape governance in the country. Analysts note that questions over the interim government’s handling of security, political freedoms and economic challenges are likely to dominate public debate in the coming weeks. Hasina’s critique adds to broader concerns about the credibility of the electoral process and the role of extremist groups in shaping political discourse — concerns that both domestic observers and foreign diplomats say will be crucial to address if Bangladesh is to navigate a peaceful democratic transition.
With national elections scheduled for February 2026, Bangladesh’s political climate is increasingly marked by widespread violence, communal tension and attacks on dissenting voices — raising concerns among analysts, civil society and international observers about a deepening democratic crisis. Critics say that since the interim government under Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus took power in August 2024, the landscape has shifted dramatically. Incidents of mob violence, ethnic attacks and threats to free expression have surged, and political polarization has intensified. These developments are overshadowing hopes for a peaceful, credible electoral transition in the country.
Observers highlight a troubling pattern of violence including attacks on cultural institutions, media outlets, and prominent activists. In mid‑December 2025, mobs targeted major newspapers and cultural organisations in Dhaka, jeopardising both press freedom and artistic expression, according to rights groups. One of the most shocking incidents shaping public perception was the lynching of Dipu Chandra Das, a young Hindu man accused of blasphemy. Das was beaten and killed by a mob, an event that not only shocked civil society but also drew international attention to the fragility of law and order in Bangladesh.
Reports from rights organisations underscore a sharp uptick in blasphemy‑related violence and attacks against religious minorities throughout 2025. More than 70 separate incidents were documented from mid‑year through December, including mob beatings, vandalism of homes and communal unrest in multiple districts. These events point to a climate where accusations can quickly escalate into mass violence, particularly in areas with limited law‑enforcement response.
Political opponents of the interim government argue that state institutions — from law enforcement to the judiciary — have been strained by political divides and have failed to protect vulnerable groups or uphold democratic norms. Former political leaders have publicly blamed the current administration for increasing lawlessness and loss of control, asserting that the breakdown in public order reflects deeper governance challenges. At the same time, some social and political analysts point out that longstanding political rivalries have magnified tensions, and that voices across the spectrum are calling for greater transparency and safeguards ahead of the upcoming elections.
Cross‑border repercussions have also emerged. Protests by diaspora communities and activist groups in neighbouring countries underscore how events in Bangladesh are reverberating beyond its borders. Some international rights organisations have emphasised the need to protect freedom of expression and ensure meaningful civic participation, particularly at a moment when the nation is preparing to elect a new parliament.
With the February 2026 election approaching, stakeholders in Bangladesh face the complex challenge of balancing security, social cohesion and democratic participation. Analysts stress that meaningful reform — including strengthening protections for minorities, safeguarding press freedom, and ensuring accountability for violent acts — will be essential to restoring confidence in the country’s democratic future. For many citizens and observers, the coming months will be a critical test of Bangladesh’s resilience and its ability to uphold democratic principles amid deep political and social tensions.
A gathering aimed at promoting dialogue and peace in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa ended in controversy this month after two student activists attending the event went missing, fueling renewed criticism of Pakistan’s handling of political dissent and human rights.
On November 12, 2025, a “peace jirga” brought together tribal elders, clerics, civil society figures, and students in Peshawar to discuss rising security concerns amid tensions along the Afghan border. According to eyewitness accounts, Khubaib Wazir and Adnan Wazir, both members of the Waziristan Students’ Society, left the event but never returned to their hostel. Local reports indicate the two were intercepted by men in plain clothes believed to be linked to state security forces and have not been seen since. Neither their families nor authorities have provided any official information on their whereabouts.
Human rights organisations have long documented enforced disappearances in Pakistan — a practice in which individuals are taken into custody without legal process or acknowledgment by state agencies. Families of missing persons and rights groups argue that this tactic is used not only against armed militants but increasingly against activists, students, and critics of military and security policies.
Official data from Pakistan’s Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances shows more than 10,000 cases recorded between 2011 and 2025, including thousands in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. Independent estimates suggest that hundreds more cases go unreported due to fear or lack of legal recourse. Activists and civil society organisations note that enforced disappearances have been especially prevalent in regions with long‑standing tensions, where security operations and counter‑insurgency measures historically intersect with political grievances and ethnic identity struggles.
Recent months have also seen a surge in activism around the issue, particularly in Balochistan, where campaigns against enforced disappearances have been organised to highlight the plight of missing persons. Civil society groups have documented cases involving both men and women, calling for accountability and transparency from state institutions. Protests have included efforts to spotlight the disappearance of entire families and symbolic actions to challenge state indifference. In some instances, demonstrations have even impacted major transportation routes. Local communities in Balochistan blocked portions of the China‑Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) to protest the rise in disappearances, underscoring the depth of frustration over unresolved cases and the lack of official responses.
Human rights organisations both inside and outside Pakistan have repeatedly called for an end to enforced disappearances and for meaningful investigations into reported cases. Critics argue that conflating peaceful activism with security threats undermines civil liberties and fuels mistrust between communities and the state. Rights advocates say that families of missing persons are often left in limbo, forced to navigate lengthy legal processes while facing silence from authorities and little recourse through the courts. They call for stronger institutional safeguards, accountability for security personnel, and legal reforms to prevent future abuses.
Pakistani officials have generally maintained that security operations are necessary for maintaining order amid complex regional conflicts, but they deny systemic abuses. Government representatives often assert that any cases of disappearance are matters of national security and subject to legal review. However, persistent reports from rights groups and families suggest a gap between official rhetoric and public experience. The incident involving the two student activists has reinvigorated debate about the limits of civic engagement in Pakistan. Critics of enforced disappearances argue that silencing dissent through abductions not only violates fundamental rights but also stifles legitimate dialogue on peace and accountability — ironically targeting those who seek those very outcomes.